@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

Lugh

@Lugh@futurology.today

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

I’m surprised more people aren’t aware of how rapidly robotics are currently developing. The same LLM AI that is capturing public attention with generative art and ChatGPT is equally revolutionizing robots.

Here’s an illustration of it. This is the closest I’ve seen yet of a mass-market-priced and extremely capable robot that could sell in tens of millions around the world. This looks close to the type of robot you could bring to many workplaces and get to do a wide range of unskilled work. How long before we see fast food places fully staffed by robots like these? At the current rate of development that seems only 2 or 3 years away.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

My theory would be that some western people are very disquieted to see China take the lead in various technological fields. When I post in r/futurology on Reddit I constantly observe this in China related comments and discussion.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

If advanced alien civilizations exist, then searching for them via their electromagnetic radiation techno-signatures seems an obvious route.

That said, I’ve never been very convinced by the idea of Dyson spheres. Surely if you were that technologically advanced you could think of cleverer ways to generate energy than building some cyberpunk structure that was bigger than a star.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

There’s a strong push-back against AI regulation within some quarters. Predictably, the issue seems to have split along polarized political lines. With right-wing leaning people not favoring regulation. They see themselves as ‘Accelerationist’ and those with concerns about AI as ‘Doomers’.

Meanwhile the unaddressed problems mount. AI can already deceive us, even when we design it not to do so, and we don’t why.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

Perhaps, but the researchers say the people who developed the AI don’t know the mechanism whereby this happens.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

I’m interested to see how this develops. If this is a base model other companies can freely acquire with no license costs or restrictions, then it might quickly expand the range of humanoid robots available.

I’m expecting China to take the lead in manufacturing “cheap” humanoid robots, and exporting them. There are demos of humanoid robots training themselves to do simple household tasks. How soon before you can buy a Humanoid Robot Maid in the shops?

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

Current LLM models tend to extract “best practice” responses a lot. They can statistically guess the correct responses to things, because it’s what experts cite the most. I wonder if that is what is behind this? As the authors of the research point out, the significance here is not the AI’s appearance of superior intelligence, it’s that it’s yet another example of how people may be influenced by AI.

Lugh,
@Lugh@futurology.today avatar

No part of this article involves AI making independent discoveries.

My reading of this is the opposite.

Although there were competing hypothesis, nobody knew how insect wing hinge mechanisms worked. Now they do, and the fundamental insight was provided via AI.

I think this is both a fundamental discovery, and one we can attribute to the AI, more than the humans involved.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • Hentai
  • doujinshi
  • announcements
  • general
  • All magazines