Huawei claims HarmonyOS NEXT kernel is 3x more efficient than Linux
Huawei has unveiled a self-developed operating system called the HarmonyOS NEXT. At the development event, the CEO described the OS as fully independent with a full-stack AI framework. The CEO has also claimed that the Harmony kernel is three times more efficient than Linux.
>try out popOS
>fonts look like mud
>look up "why is text fuzzy on popOS"
>redditor replies with "it isn't your eyes have adjusted to bad text from everywhere else"
peak linux community
To vote, please make one and only post with only the name of the girl you want to vote for. (Senko or Nagatoro) You may add an image to your vote post.
Poll closes at 3:00 PM Eastern Standard Time (-5 UTC) and any vote post made after will not be counted.
You MAY repost or quote post this thread, though it's encouraged to boost the main tourney thread as well.
But please do not use this Baest thread for discussion. Use @SuperSnekFriend 's tourney threads on Mugicha Club instead.
No account made December 2023 or later will be counted.
@thegreatape@Inginsub@binkle@mint :linus: <("Every file should be embedded with some cp in the most practical way possible. im just an engineer though and i won't care about your feelings if its done incorrectly.")
@diurnalfreak666 BAJA X TYPING STYLE DETECTED
REGISTERING INFORMATION INTO DATABASE
[=----------]
[===------]
[====----]
[=====--]
[======]
LOADING [DONE]
INITIATE BABY MONKEY TORTURE VIDEOS FOR STIMMING PURPOSES IN X11 WINDOW
TEMPLATE MESSAGE:
"Wow. If It Isnt My Buddy Bajax, The Cat. YWNBAH (HUMAN)"
@diazepam he made a stupid autistic point claiming that visual studio was "aligning the pointer wrong" (suggesting int* x with its intellitype thing) and i called him a retard and said it was really just a style choice anyway and he blocked me
@binkle@diazepam its really a style choice. Like int* x; can mean to some people "int pointer" and mentally its a fine way to think since 95% of the time when you think of pointers you are assuming that logic and only assigning one pointer to a variable. Its not supposed to be correct in the context of a compiler, but to a human being programmer its not a big deal.
The rest of it is habit and literal style preference. Old habits die hard; I personally can't break it. I work around the whole pointer thing by doing int* x, * y; and adding that space you see intentionally to be consistent.
In theory "intellitype" should've intelligently figured out his pointer style preference. With his logic you could also assume there is a correct way to name symbols (start_x, StartX, startX)... its all style and habit and what people prefer at the end of the day.
The funniest guy alive: wow i hope i can say NIGGER here.. i hope i can also say FAGGOT too.... uhm yep, free speech exists here😁 Comedy is okay thanks to based gigachad admins!