18+ gabriel, 3 months ago

I caught the start of this and it was fascinating to witness.
The host basically started off tunnel-visioning web3/ipfs and then got their asses handed to them by two veteran techies who basically pointed out they underestimated the problem, but were dismissed for being "too technical". 🙄

To make it simpler, the worst case scenario is that it simply won't be legally advisable to speak out about anything controversial at all, regardless of the means used. Technical advice isn't legal advice after all.

Am I opposed to the expansion of the state's power to censor? Absolutely. But you're astonishingly naive if your plan is to host a twitter space "how will I evade the thought police?".
It seems that being "safe" from attacks (state or otherwise) and being effective are opposite goals.

If one strongly believed that the law was going to be unjustifiably used (which I think is a fair expectation) the best course of action isn't to strategize how to endure it, but rather scramble together resources for the inevitable court challenge. Or at least oppose it before it passes....