I am still trying to decide what I think about things like this. On one hand they aren't outright saying that the books should be banned so it's not necessarily blatant hypocrisy. On the other hand "they don't meet our qualifications as banned books" is. They are banned all over the place. Someone else decided other people can't read them.
It is not "self-evident" that any book anywhere should literally be prevented from being available. If you think that you are a book banner, so make your advocacy about something else than free inquiry and freedom because you do not believe in those things.
