sun, 1 month ago > he doesn't have to prove anything he claimed that discovering a cipher implementation was far weaker than expected was irrelevant because he could already decrypt any radio transmission using that cipher. yes you have to prove statements like that.
> he doesn't have to prove anything
he claimed that discovering a cipher implementation was far weaker than expected was irrelevant because he could already decrypt any radio transmission using that cipher. yes you have to prove statements like that.
Add comment