@susie@TURBORETARD9000@freon the total freedom thing goes out the window once people are too dense for hunter-gatherers. then you end up having to do organized agrarian activities and by that point there is already an implicit "dance for the rich" going on.
there are some bits you can get around with duty/debt cycles. at one point (before the rockefellerization of medicine) they did see some amount of impoverished clients and it was seen as a public service similar to how lawyers have pro bono jobs.
problem with that is the civil service angle has reciprocal obligations and we did away with those with the end of feudalism, now the obligations are strictly organizing and extracting for the rich, with no longer any expectation of taking care of the poors.