Language is another abstraction, so accusations of semantic games don't really move me. Perhaps a misunderstanding would be a better explanation. Perhaps one created by language or the medium of communication. If you understood me, there could be no game.
A very intelligent person once told me "to know the name is to forget the thing." It's always stuck with me.
I've always wondered what it was like for those early philosophers who had to look into the world itself to figure things out.
There is only one reality. A game requires at least a duplicity. There are no games here.