Posts

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar

Wash yo fat ass...

FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar

lolwut?

FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
AlphaKiloPapa,
@AlphaKiloPapa@noauthority.social avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar
Humpleupagus,
@Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club avatar
FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar

Let's assume, for a moment, that global warming is real and it is an existential crisis.

Do you think that novel interventions that could wildly disrupt the atmosphere couldn't possibly have unintended, catastrophic effects?

That the "cure" could be worse than the "problem"?

Experts don't have a great track record accounting for "unintended consequences".

icedquinn,
@icedquinn@blob.cat avatar

@FortyTwo @kf01 @skylar the biggest problem is that nuclear power plants are a cover for making bombs.

icedquinn,
@icedquinn@blob.cat avatar

@FortyTwo @kf01 @skylar you never see shit like north korea going "but we need power" and people sell them thorium (non-weaponizable radioactives.) it's always uranium, cause they want them sweet refined plutonium bombos.

FortyTwo, to random
@FortyTwo@noauthority.social avatar

In the 1970s, several major attempts were made to show that inhalation of tobacco smoke would produce lung cancer in mice, rats, hamsters, dogs, and even monkeys.

Although some of these experiments involved thousands of animals, the aggregated evidence failed to confirm the human epidemiological studies. Inhalation of tobacco smoke, even if conducted over the lifetime of animals, failed to reproduce the disease seen in man

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/10915810701490380

EvilSandmich,
@EvilSandmich@poa.st avatar

@FortyTwo @cmp I’ve heard that too, and it’s completely believable, but to your original point, we’ve gone from most people smoking like freight trains to hardly anybody smoking at all. In the 90s smoking was supposed to cause every disease known to man (in addition to lung cancer) so we must be far healthier now than in, say, the late 60s now that those diseases have been eradicated, and yet I’ve seen no health zealots spiking the football on their victory 🤔

Humpleupagus,
@Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club avatar

Smoking is for rookies. Skoal got me through undergrad.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • Hentai
  • doujinshi
  • announcements
  • general
  • All magazines