My fellow goyim, excuse me, my fellow White nationalists, only shitskins marry wives to bear children. Real White men marry post-wall wives of the same age, for love, goy. Love is love.
I have no idea what you are even saying. Speak like a normal person, nigger.
It is quite evident to us, that you use obvious ZOG terminology. You claim to be a "real WN," yet you don't talk like one at all. Your posts look like what a NYT writer thinks a WN should say.
Lets see if you can commit thoughtcrime in your reply. You don't have to agree with it, you just have to copy paste what you think the redpilled answer would be in your reply.
Complete the following the sentence: Women misbehave because –
[A] Capitalism makes them misbehave, by economically incentivizing reckless high time-reference behavior over long-term planning. The capitalist class benefits from one night stands and sterility, as it benefits from third world immigration of spendthrift cheap labor to replace frugal Whites. If it weren’t for capitali$m, women would totally be completely sinless angels.
[B] The (((jews))) make these totally innocent angels misbehave, since the jews own the media and the entire entertainment industry from Hollywood down to the tiniest pornography studio, and use them to direct propaganda at women, telling them to fuck blacks and lowlifes. There’s no way that pure White women desire to be on OnlyFans to whore for money. The jews forced these angels on that website.
[C] Sorry, but this is a misleading question. Women don’t misbehave at all. All misbehavior is done by men, who are vile pigs.
[D] Lecherous men make them misbehave, since men are ultimately responsible for all female behavior (including misbehavior), and unlike women, men have self-control and moral agency. Thus it logically follows that any female misbehavior would merely reflect bad decisions taken by irresponsible and lustful men. It is men’s fault entirely, so men must be forced to pay for every bad decision done by any random women.
[E] They are feral, blindly following ancient instincts from prehistoric times, which instincts tell them to cruise for rape by alpha male Chads, and to resist kicking-and-screaming all attempts to restrain them from pursuing alpha male Chads. Stable monogamy has always been a way to allow each man to own a woman so each man can start a family and raise a future generation for civilization’s survival.
[REFUSES TO ANSWER A REDPILL ON WOMEN QUESTION, EVEN TO DISAGREE WITH THE ANSWER]
You claim that you "spent lots of time serving WN causes."
Sure you did, as an FBI informant. Does Graf know that a subversive like you, is lurking in Poast?
:soyglows:
I don't think that husbands should rape their wives.
Before the 1970s, EVERYONE believed that the husband has a right to have sex with his wife, anytime he wants. Including your FBI.
"Marital rape" simply didn't exist as a concept. The marriage is the permission. Then ZOG invented "marital rape" out of thin air, to destroy White birthrates.
Back when I posted on Infowars, there was a little shit admin who used to erase my posts all the time. He left and moved up to the northwest, but he was an asshole too. I can't remember his name now. Drat! Anyway, you're telling me that the admin here is a low-brow. Fits.
Not as low brow as a low IQ retard who can't pass the breakfast test.
@EarlofAlbemarle Not sure if serious or not but here's the scoop for anyone who still needs to hear it:
Women are hypergamous by nature. They want the biggest, baddest gigachad they can get, which is why they're only really interested in the top 5% with the next 15% being "alright" and the bottom 80% not even showing up on their radar. The good news is not every girl can get Brad Pitt and you just have to outdo the competition in your area, but you still have to put in the effort. They may seem cold and self-centered, but you have to understand that simply by virtue of being a female they've been inundated with male attention from their peers since the moment they hit the kindergarten playground, and they simply don't have enough damns to give for every guy that so much as flutters his eyelids at them.
So what do women want? Well there are two sides to this, which can be summed up as "alpha f###s and beta bucks", or more politely "alpha seed and beta need". In other words, they want a guy who's self-assured and capable, and exerts dominance in all that he does, yet at the same time they also want a good provider who will care for them and the kids. Which way they lean depends on things like their age/position in life or even just their menstrual cycles, but it should be noted that while they have some emotional need for the "beta" side of hypergamy once in a long-term relationship, it is only the alpha side that actually attracts them. YOU WILL NOT ATTRACT A WOMAN - I DON'T CARE HOW "DIFFERENT" SHE IS FROM OTHER GIRLS - BY BEING A "NICE GUY".
So what does that mean in practice? In short, just be a better man for your own sake, "build it and they will come" and all that, and don't be afraid to piss her off. Don't just sit there fawning over her every whim, intentionally don't take things seriously and playfully misinterpret what she says, don't always be available to be her emotional tampon whenever she wants, if married smack her on the ass, chicks love that stuff; have some basic self-respect in other words and she will respect you back for it. If you want to learn more, The Rational Male and Chateau Heartiste are goldmines, and both have book compilations of their blog posts available on Amazon if that's more your thing, and Dalrock is of particular interest for understanding wahmen in a Christian context. Speaking of which, I didn't really get into patriarchal headship but tl;dr God appointed Adam as Eve's head and there is no squaring modern "complementarian" notions of "co-equality" with everything Scripture has to say on the subject. See Stone Choir for that. stone-choir.com/on-women-scripture-and-ontology/