you are not entitled to use or do anything with the code for any commercial or other purpose, other than review, compilation and non-commercial distribution in accordance with the terms of this license.
“review” means to access, analyse, test and otherwise review the code as a reference, for the sole purpose of analysing it for defects.
doesn’t it allow compilation and non-commercial distribution? I don’t agree with the license (not free or open source), but I’m genuinely curious on what specifically doesn’t allow source code modification.
It does allow compilation and non-commercial distribution, as per the terms my comment above. If you’re curious as to what disallows source code modifications, that is also contained in the terms included in my comment above.
That’s their goal. They have good intentions. But it also means no commercial use.
You can’t do “Hey, can you add this feature to this app, I’ll pay you” or “Here is much improved version you can buy from me” or “We give you paid support and help for this software for your company”. Eventually all improvements bounce back to original creators anyway, see: vital paid Wordpress theme ecosystem, most of them being GPL licenced.
With project getting bigger such restriction can be almost as bad as with propietary app. Like, imagine Linux kernel but only with Linus Torvalds having right to sell computers with it or offer any services making money.
In the “Smartphone Awards 2023!” YouTube video, the host highlights various categories of smartphones, starting with the best big phone, which is won by the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra for its understated design, advanced hardware capabilities, software updates, and stylus support. The host also discusses the best small phones and folding phones, with the Asus Zenphone 10 being crowned the winner for its 5.9-inch display, competitive hardware, and elimination of previous nitpicks. The iPhone 15 Pro receives recognition for the best camera in a smartphone due to its total performance, ease of use, and excellent video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is identified as the best value option, offering essential features at an affordable price without significant drawbacks. The presenter acknowledges the OnePlus Open as the best foldable phone due to its innovative design, nearly perfect square folding screen, and unique multitasking features.
I upgraded mine to an S23 last March. Main reason was because the battery could no longer last through the day. Otherwise I was perfectly content with it.
I like to buy the phone outright rather than get one on contract but the flagship phones are just so expensive nowadays. My S8’s battery is getting steadily worse so I’ll probably upgrade when I can no longer ignore it. At the minute I just don’t feel like I can justify such a massive expense for something that will essentially just be more of the same only a bit bigger and a bit faster. Maybe I’ll go for a Pixel instead.
I didn’t want to risk damaging it as I needed it for work. It was much safer to upgrade and then try to experiment with the S8. There’s also the fact they stopped giving the S8 security updates, so that’s a big concern, too.
After having used the S23, I couldn’t go back anymore. It’s significantly better in most ways. I always keep battery saver mode on which stops charging at 85%. With how much I use my phone, the charge rarely goes below 40%.
I did try Sony’s 5 IV before the S23. I really wanted to love it, but as a photographer, there were some fatal flaws with the camera apps. It had so much going for it, too: 5000 mAh battery (S23’s is 3900 mAh, S8’s is 3000), audio jack, microSD card slot, removable SIM card, 4k OLED screen, a dedicated shutter button for the cameras, and can record 4k 120Hz video, if only for a literal minute.
If you don’t plan on using your phone for more professional photos (even though that’s kind of what they market it for…), I would recommend checking out their lineup.
Edit: Oh, and Sony only officially supports their phones for two years. Compare that with Samsung’s 5. So that’s another thing to consider.
IIRC people with older devices have found that replacing their battery does not significantly help, becathe replacement battery was manufactured at roughly the same time as the device it goes into, and has degraded over time even without use. This is anecdotal of course, but seems reasonable to me.
Some short browsing appears to indicate that batteries can last for years of stored properly, but how does one verify if the replacement battery in their phone was really stored appropriately?
I'm one of them. Thank you.
I do agree though that his titles and thumbnails are annoyingly clickbaity. Perhaps it would be better to just title the post as "Reporting from Ukraine: 11 Feb"?
youtube.com
Oldest