Democratic nations are annihilated when we give education over to the kikes, they're annihilated when we import hordes of retards. Democracies cannot be open societies - each new citizen, naturalized or immigrated, must be taught the values which are fundamental to our society. If they cannot do this, then they cannot be allowed to participate in it.
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@Awoo@nihil >Democratic nations are annihilated when we give education over to the kikes, they're annihilated when we import hordes of retards. Democracies cannot be open societies - each new citizen, naturalized or immigrated, must be taught the values which are fundamental to our society. If they cannot do this, then they cannot be allowed to participate in it.
Yet it is the fault of democracy which caused all of this to happened in the first place. A stricter Republic ruled by nobles is better than democratic republic in this matter.
@MK2boogaloo@Awoo@nihil Your understanding of US history is weak if you believe this. Starting in the 1860s, kikes started assassinating leaders who were not friendly to kikes. Every form of representative government is weak to "leaders with a certain opinion are repeatedly killed," it is honestly a testament to the strength of Democracy that we have remained half-functioning for as long as we have.
A strict Republic ruled by nobles would have bent the knee to the jew far faster. Monarchies historically kowtowed to the gold of the jew, requiring the earliest form of democracy - the mob - to remove them. Jews were removed more often by torch and pitchfork than by crown and scepter.
Democracy has been the solution to the jew for centuries, even if it was not always called "Democracy."
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@Awoo@nihil@MK2boogaloo Over a thousand years of attempted jewish subversion of of monarchical western Christendom resulted in rotten financial tricks and debt politics by the jews, which occasionally resulted in their expulsion.
In the less than two hundred of the democratic west their subversion has resulted in "gay marriage", child mutilation, abortion and equal rights to women and minorities.
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@Awoo@nihil >Your understanding of US history is weak if you believe this. Starting in the 1860s, kikes started assassinating leaders who were not friendly to kikes. Every form of representative government is weak to "leaders with a certain opinion are repeatedly killed," it is honestly a testament to the strength of Democracy that we have remained half-functioning for as long as we have.
I believe in this because I have a good understanding of world history instead of just watching over the US history, which is younger and frankly more pathetic than the rest of the world. Because by that point, the 1860s, the rest of the world is in the era of British domination. The rule of the British was supported greatly by the Jews obviously, but not to the point of total control like today. If we counted right, monarchy has survived far longer than American democracy.
>A strict Republic ruled by nobles would have bent the knee to the jew far faster. Monarchies historically kowtowed to the gold of the jew, requiring the earliest form of democracy - the mob - to remove them. Jews were removed more often by torch and pitchfork than by crown and scepter.
That is blatantly false, the Venetian republic was one of the republic governed by nobles and they only fell after Napoleon conquered them. That republic has lasted for 1,100 years. It took a very long time for them to fell. If you want another case then go look at Netherlands.
The point of monarchies accepting the gold of the jews are also fake. Only Britain accepted the money, and I believe it's not without a great struggle on the background. It took a World War to kill the monarchs and allowed the jews full control. Can you say that about the US?
And I agree with your statement of the mob being the earliest form of Democracy. Since they're easily fooled and controlled by anyone. Surely you know of this.
>Democracy has been the solution to the jew for centuries, even if it was not always called "Democracy."
The one that chooses Barabas over Jesus was the mob, the Democracy that you love so much.
@MK2boogaloo@Awoo@nihil >Cites the most successful examples of their form of government in history
>While neglecting the piles of failures
Sure - there are a small number of republics which have lasted longer than the US. That's natural - democratic societies only flourished starting in the 1700s/1800s, and it is currently 2024. If you're picking the most successful few examples, then there is not going to be a democratic society today which can stand up to that - not enough time has elapsed. Meanwhile, there's been a very large number of monarchies and republics over the course of history - it is only natural that a few of them would last for some time.
>The point of monarchies accepting the gold of the jews are also fake. Only Britain accepted the money
What nonsense. Portugal bent the knee to the jew in the 1600s. Spain bent the knee to the jew for most of the 1st millennium. Various places in Italy bent the knee to the jew repeatedly.
With almost every expulsion of the jew, there is a prior "bending the knee to the jew" that happened which made things bad enough they had to be expelled.
>The one that chooses Barabas over Jesus was the mob, the Democracy that you love so much.
You miss an important part of that story - the jew was thrown into the midst of the crowd. Do you think that there was only one jew in that crowd cheering for Barabas?
Regardless, you are not wrong - mobs are susceptible to many different forms of treachery, and that is why we develop various protections to keep Democracies from becoming mere mobs. Although it is a better form of government than bending the knee to someone who bends the knee to jews, mobs are certainly not an ideal form of government.
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@Awoo@nihil >Sure - there are a small number of republics which have lasted longer than the US. That's natural - democratic societies only flourished starting in the 1700s/1800s, and it is currently 2024. If you're picking the most successful few examples, then there is not going to be a democratic society today which can stand up to that - not enough time has elapsed. Meanwhile, there's been a very large number of monarchies and republics over the course of history - it is only natural that a few of them would last for some time.
That just proves my point of republic and monarchy being better system than democracy. No one was stupid enough to implement democracy at that time. The decay that happened to democracy happens faster than if the same thing were to occur in noble republic or monarchy.
>What nonsense. Portugal bent the knee to the jew in the 1600s. Spain bent the knee to the jew for most of the 1st millennium. Various places in Italy bent the knee to the jew repeatedly.
What is bending their knees to the jews exactly? Asking for them to lend you money??? Or what exactly? The Portuguese also lasted longer than any democracy on Earth, even after WW2 they still retain their colonies. The Italian cities were never controlled by any jews in fact, can you even state one that was under their control?
>You miss an important part of that story - the jew was thrown into the midst of the crowd. Do you think that there was only one jew in that crowd cheering for Barabas?
They are in fact jewish, if we throw one jew to the crowd without any control of the crowd, they would be under his rule.
>Regardless, you are not wrong - mobs are susceptible to many different forms of treachery, and that is why we develop various protections to keep Democracies from becoming mere mobs. Although it is a better form of government than bending the knee to someone who bends the knee to jews, mobs are certainly not an ideal form of government.
It's already a system of mere mobs. What do you expect from it? I think you need to look at the history of the world more instead of Americanism. Because Americanism only produce gay arguments like these.
>I have a good understanding of world history
Really? Either you're an immortal, or you've been reading what's been published. Who runs the publishing houses? After the war, the Allies destroyed a lot of Germany's written history. Ever wonder what kind of knowledge they might have contained?
Add comment