I went to a good law school, when I came back home I took my bar/bri classes at a local law school. Those fucking kids drooled on themselves, and I'm not saying that I was the smartest kid in my class. They're were some really fucking brilliant kids at my school. But some kids who go to law school are drool babies, and some school accept and/or produce them in mass.
I then took the bar here in California when it was considered the hardest in the country. It was three days, six hours each day. I studied my ass off for two months ahead of time. I passed.
Now in practice, I regularly run into dumb attorneys. I don't mean they're dumb because they disagree with my position. I mean they're fucking dumb, and they passed the bar.
In light of who can pass, I can't imagine what is going to happen when states are admitting kids that can't pass the exam. Competency will go out the fucking window.
My question is what is the courts plan to bury the fact the they're allowing retards to practice, e.g. lower malpractice standards? Blame the clients in cases before them?
everything is collapsing and when they do shit like this to erode and remove standards and confidence in our legal system ... not only that buty weaponizing it against Whites ... its time for war .... there is no political solution
How dare the state require people to read and write and prove they can do it for three days straight when they just want to be in a profession where they read and write for days on end. 😒
When shit hits the fan, just remember that all regimes require persons knowledged in governmental / structural issues, even if it's martial. Bring me on board so I can wear a cool robe and give sage advice. 😏
Paralegal here. Can confirm. The number of window-licking, paste-eating lawyers is staggering. My favorite objection by far is: "Vague. Plaintiff does not know what Defendant means by 'put attach policy docments here for all wholesale equipment for costs to Plaintiff for all years", or other spectacularly retarded word salad.
Michigan is vastly different. "Vague" is used for word salad here. "Ambiguous" is used for unclear rogs or RFP. We see a lot of "Cumulative" - paste-eating associates demanding all correspondence that they sent us (in those words; "Copies of all correspondence (etc.) that Def. sent to Plaintiff"), a SHOCKING amount of demands for "all correspondence between Pl. Atty and client", and way more Bronson objections than I used to see 16 years ago in LA when I was with Dreier Stein.
I am but a lowly paralegal. I do my discoveries and disclosures and auths.
I did case mgmt at Dreier, which was a lot more fun, mostly because the Lexis guy would take us out for nice lunches when they knew big cases were coming up, to schmooze us into using their electronic war rooms... Our office at the Water Gardens didn't hurt either.
I'm one of those small town attorneys. I do everything myself. Roll up my sleeves and get in the mud. If you're an old local and I like you, I'll even come to your house or place of business. Just flatter and feed me while I'm there. I'm easy.
@Humpleupagus@matty@n3f_X
Maybe on the flip side, it causes the dumbest niggers and other criminals to represent themselves and get convicted more often?
It'll likely result in a more refined attorney caste system. The system already exists to address this issue, for the most part.
This seems more like something intended to grind the judicial system to a crawl. The number of cases brought before courts will increase.... in a system where a backlog already exists.
Add comment